As indicated in the previous buyer
behavior interview, my market segment is that of middle-aged parents with
children. My research began if you
recall was for a hub like structure in which those indulging in marijuana use within
public places (streets, parks etc.) could do so without disturbing the quiet
enjoyment of others who may not have the same disposition. In keeping
with this assignments requirement of how buyers evaluate stuff, I interviewed
three new prospects who meet my model’s market segment requirement.
In
interviewing these prospective influencer’s, alternatives to supporting the
purchasing of my smoke hubs were introduced. The only viable alternative to my
endeavor at this time, would be doing nothing. I did receive varying levels of
interest in supporting my product. Decisions on weather or not to support /
pressure local governments and marijuana companies to partake in investing came
down to what increases would be necessary in local taxes, property taxes, or
whatever form of financial allocation deemed as options. All were noticeably
more interested when I made clear that most of the financial need would come from
grower’s and others who directly benefit from this newly introduced
legislation.
Consensus
was noted that because my product is rather unique in the marketplace, the
traditional evaluation process had to be slightly altered. No current
competition made for an easier buying decision. Where the qualifying mostly occurred
is weather or not there is an emerging need for the same. My cross section of interviewees
felt there was based on my previous points having been made within my ‘Solving
the Problem’ blog.
Post
purchase, all of those interviewed agreed that so long as monies can be
allocated from new sources, and not tapping current local budgets which are
already constrained that they would feel good after influencing these
decisions.
In
closing, nothing within my new interviews changed the trajectory of the buyer
process. Middle aged parents with children are still inclined to support
influencing the purchasing of this endeavor. The alternative being doing nothing
and dealing with the fallout associated with introducing the use of a product
having a known social stigma into a society not fully prepared for its
integration. Purchase decisions for this segment I would describe as pragmatic
and sensible.
Nice post Carlton. I thought you did a great job of adapting the buyer behavior process to your proposed product. As you noted, the traditional buyer behavior process is somewhat irrelevant to your product, because it has no alternatives. Despite this challenge, you did a great job of noting the buying processes that would be relevant to your product. You adapted nicely to a slightly altered model. Good post.
ReplyDeleteHey Carlton, this was a really good blog post and I really enjoyed reading it. You did exactly what you was asked of you in this assignment. I think you learned a lot of valuable information with all these interviews that you have done and it has really helped you with your idea.
ReplyDelete