Testing the Hypothesis, Part 2

Who: As you may recall, the unmet opportunity I have been investigating is a discrete option for cannabis users to indulge in their use while in public places, without inconveniencing those who do not share their lifestyle. After interviewing various individuals, I found a mix of interests in resolving this issue. There were some that were concerned with individual air quality and agreed a buffer would be beneficial, and then there were those who did not agree with any intercession to create a buffer between the two sides. The latter felt that while the idea seemed novel, it did not seem practical. Additionally, these individuals also had an issue with how this endeavor would all be funded.

What: Between the two sides; those interested in hearing more, or aiding in the development of a buffer, and those that prefer not to intercede, the point of whether to get involved depended primarily on finances. The individuals I spoke with while understanding the inconvenience some may have, did not feel it would be a best use of funds.

Why: The underlying cause of the outsider’s need is very different than the people inside as those inside appeared more concern with embracing the change, whereas those on the outside were more abrupt and appear less interested in accepting what is soon to be a societal norm.

Inside the boundary	Outside the boundary
Those who have children, animals And may care-take the elderly	Those more interested in the limitations of What they perceive as limitations on their newly Introduced civil liberties.
The need is to improve the quality of life For those disinterested in second hand Cannibus smoke.	They do not foresee an issue that requires interference.
The need exists due to the discomfort Some feel the change will create.	The preference would be to allow the change to occur as it Is proposed and for everyone to accept it as cigarette smoke is Accepted.